Comparing the potassium requirements of canola and wheat

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Brennan, RF
dc.contributor Bolland, MDA
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-08T00:40:33Z
dc.date.available 2012-03-08T00:40:33Z
dc.date.issued 2007
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/31560
dc.description.abstract Most sandy soils used for cropping in south-western Australia are now deficient in potassium (K) due to removal of K from soil in hay and grain, and profitable grain yield responses to applied fertiliser K are commonly obtained for spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and canola (oilseed rape, Brassica napus L.). However, there are only limited data comparing the K requirements of these 2 species in the region. In a glasshouse experiment we compared the K requirements of wheat (cv. Westonia), conventional canola cv. Outback (cultivars of canola not produced by classical breeding techniques to be tolerant of specific herbicides), triazine-tolerant (TT) canola cvv. Pinnacle and Surpass 501, and imidazolinone-tolerant (IT) canola cv. Surpass 603. The following measures were used: yield of 54-day-old dried shoots and seed (grain) without added K, applied K required to produce 90% of the maximum yield of shoots and grain, K required to attain a K concentration in shoots of 30�g/kg, and K required to achieve a K content in shoots (K concentration multiplied by yield) of 40�mg/pot. We also determined for each species and cultivar the concentration of K in dried shoots that was related to 90% of the maximum grain yield, to estimate critical concentration in shoots below which K deficiency was likely to reduce grain production. All 4 canola cultivars produced similar results. Both canola and wheat produced negligible shoot yields and no grain when no K was applied. For each species and cultivar the amount of applied K required to produce 90% of the maximum yield was similar for shoots and grain, and was ~121�mg�K/pot for the 4 canola cultivars and 102�mg�K/pot for wheat, so ~19% more K was required for canola than for wheat. For each amount of K applied, the concentration of K in shoots was greater for canola than for wheat. The amount of applied K required to attain a K concentration of 30�g�K/kg in shoots was ~96�mg�K/pot for canola and 142�mg�K/pot for wheat, so ~48% more K was required by wheat than by canola. The amount of K applied required to achieve a K content of 40�mg�K/pot in shoots was ~46�mg�K/pot for canola and 53�mg�K/pot for wheat, so ~13% more applied K was required by wheat than by canola. The data suggest that canola roots were better able to obtain K from soil than wheat roots, but wheat used the K taken up more effectively than canola to produce shoots and grain. The concentration of K in dried shoots of 54-day-old plants that was related to 90% of the maximum dried shoot yield or grain was ~32�g/kg for canola and ~23�g/kg for wheat.
dc.publisher CSIRO
dc.source.uri http://www.publish.csiro.au/?act=view_file&file_id=AR06244.pdf
dc.subject critical concentration of potassium
dc.subject triazine-tolerant (TT) canola
dc.subject imidazolinone-tolerant (IT) canola
dc.title Comparing the potassium requirements of canola and wheat
dc.type Research
dc.description.version Journal article
dc.identifier.volume 58
dc.identifier.page 359-366
dc.identifier.issue 4


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account